Knob-and-Tube, Aluminum Wiring, and Cloth Insulation in NH & VT: What Actually Matters

Old houses have old electrical systems. This should not come as a tremendous surprise.

A house built in 1890 wasn’t wired for electricity at all. A house built in 1925 wasn’t designed around microwaves, heat pumps, hair dryers, hot tubs, EV chargers, and seventeen rechargeable gadgets per resident. Over the decades these houses got wired, rewired, added onto, half-updated, and occasionally “improved” by someone whose main qualification was owning a pair of pliers.

None of that means every old house needs a full rewire. It does mean the wiring deserves a real look, not a glance and a shrug.

I’ve spent twenty-plus years working on houses before I ever started inspecting them, and electrical is where I slow down the most. Unlike a dripping faucet or a rotten windowsill, electrical problems hide, they don’t always warn you before they fail, and the stakes are higher. The trick is telling apart three different things: old equipment that still works fine, a defect that needs fixing, and a condition that’s a genuine safety concern right now. Those are not the same thing, and treating them like they are helps nobody.

One thing I want to be clear about before we go further: none of what follows is a case for leaving old wiring alone. “Not an emergency” and “fine as-is” are two completely different conclusions, and I only ever draw the first one. Electrical technology and code have made real leaps since any of this material was installed, and once I find wiring that’s old, degraded, or ungrounded, I’m going to recommend upgrading it — every time, regardless of whether it happens to be behaving itself on inspection day. What follows is context for why I call these things out the way I do, not a reason to skip the upgrade.

A new panel doesn’t mean a new house

Here’s the misunderstanding I run into constantly: buyer sees a shiny new breaker panel and assumes the whole electrical system got updated.

Maybe it did. Or maybe someone swapped the panel and left everything behind the walls exactly as it was — cloth-covered cable, ungrounded circuits, knob-and-tube, a few generations of “temporary” fixes all still doing their jobs. The panel is the distribution center. It’s not the whole system. Replacing it is a little like putting a new front door on the house and calling the whole thing renovated.

So when I see a new panel in an old house, I want to know what came with it. Was the wiring feeding it upgraded too, or is this just a nice new box connected to eighty years of accumulated adventure? You have to look past the cover.

Most of it, I never actually see

Worth being straight about something here: even in a thorough inspection, I’m looking at a fraction of the actual wiring in an old house. The vast majority of it is buried — behind plaster and lath, behind drywall, under insulation, inside walls nobody’s opened since the day they were closed up. A home inspection is visual and non-invasive.

What I can generally see is what’s landed at the panel. What I mostly can’t see is everything in between — the switch boxes, the fixtures, the receptacles, every connection along the run. I’m not pulling cover plates off every outlet in the house or disassembling fixtures to get at those connections, and a lot of them are sealed behind the same plaster and lath that’s hiding the wire itself.

That matters because the connections, not the wire runs, are usually where the real problems live. A length of knob-and-tube sitting quietly in a wall cavity is rarely the issue. A splice somebody made decades ago, or a switch box somebody “fixed” and closed back up, tucked behind a wall nobody’s opened since — that’s a different story, and it’s exactly the kind of thing a visual inspection isn’t built to catch.

I do a fair amount of demo work on houses like these in the course of renovation projects, and I’ve opened up walls and found connections nobody has laid eyes on since the day the plaster went back up — the kind of work that would make an electrician wince, done by someone who closed the wall thinking it was a job well done. In that era, perhaps it was.

That’s not to discredit the value of a home inspection. It’s just the honest limit of what one can tell you, and it’s worth knowing that limit exists before deciding an old house’s wiring is fine because nothing turned up on inspection day. If anything, it’s one more reason the recommendation doesn’t change based on what happens to be visible: if what I can see is old, ungrounded, or degraded, there’s no reason to assume what I can’t see is in better shape.

Knob-and-tube isn’t a diagnosis by itself

Knob-and-tube wiring — separate conductors run on porcelain knobs, protected by porcelain tubes through framing — shows up in houses from the late 1800s through the early 1900s. It looks ancient because it is ancient. That doesn’t mean every inch of it is actively trying to burn the house down.

The real issue is what’s happened to it since. It was designed to shed heat into open air. Bury it in insulation, splice it badly, overload it, or extend it using methods the original electrician never dreamed of, and now you’ve got a problem. It also usually has no ground wire at all — which matters a lot once modern three-prong plugs and grounded appliances show up expecting one.

What I actually want to know when I find it: is it still live, how much of it is left, is it buried in insulation, is the visible insulation cracking, has anyone extended it, and is there a fake sense of grounding from a three-prong outlet tacked onto the end of it? None of that gets answered by one photo of a porcelain knob.

Here’s where I don’t leave room for interpretation: when I find active knob-and-tube, I recommend it come out. Not because it’s about to burst into flame the week you close on the house — plenty of it has been quietly doing its job for a hundred years without incident. But “not an emergency” and “leave it alone” are different conclusions. A modern, grounded system isn’t a luxury upgrade at this point — it’s what every appliance, safety device, and electrician working in that house today is built to expect. That’s a long way from “the house has knob-and-tube, run for your life,” and it’s just as far from “it’s holding up fine, don’t worry about it.”

“Cloth wiring” isn’t one thing

People say “cloth wiring” like it names a single system. It doesn’t. Several old wiring methods used woven fabric somewhere in the covering, and the materials underneath vary — some rubber-insulated, some early nonmetallic cable. All of it can dry out and get brittle with age, and the spot that looks the healthiest isn’t always the spot that actually is. Insulation tends to fail fastest near heat — above light fixtures, inside old boxes — so a cable can look fine along a cool basement joist and crumble the second you touch it near a ceiling fixture.

I care less about “is cloth wiring present” and more about what kind it is, what shape it’s in, how it’s spliced, whether it’s grounded, and whether renovations have disturbed or extended it. Old wiring doesn’t remain in excellent shape until suddenly reaching an expiration date, it degrades steadily over time, and as it degrades, risk increases.

Two-prong outlets are honest. Three-prong outlets can lie.

A two-slot outlet is basically telling you the truth: this circuit probably isn’t grounded. That was normal once. The trouble starts when someone swaps in a three-prong outlet without doing anything about the ground behind it.

That third hole isn’t decorative — it gives a fault a safe path to travel instead of sitting on the metal case of your appliance waiting for someone to touch it. An ungrounded two-prong outlet at least looks like what it is. A three-prong outlet on an ungrounded circuit looks modern and invites you to plug in things that expect real grounding. People also use cheater type adapters to plug three pronged devices to two prong outlets.

I call out every two-prong outlet I find, and I recommend grounding the circuit — full stop. Not because an ungrounded outlet is guaranteed to hurt someone, but because an effective grounding path helps clear electrical faults and reduces the chance of exposed metal remaining energized. There’s no good reason a modern electrical system should be missing that protection. This is one of the clearer cases where “it’s been fine for eighty years” isn’t a reason to leave it for another eighty.

And a “GFCI protected” sticker is not the same claim as “grounded.”

It is pretty common for me to see GFCI receptacles wired onto ungrounded circuits in older houses in NH & VT. GFCI protection cuts shock risk in a real way and is definitely a step in the right direction, but it doesn’t manufacture a ground path out of thin air. If you want properly grounded circuits for computers, tools, or sensitive equipment, that’s usually a new circuit, not a new faceplate.

One nastier version of this: a bootleg ground, where someone’s tied the neutral and ground together at the outlet. It can fool testers and show “all good” anyway. Neutral and ground do different jobs downstream of the main panel, and tying them together at an outlet can energize metal parts of an appliance under the wrong conditions. It’s not an upgrade — it’s electrical stage makeup, and it usually needs an electrician to sort out.

Aluminum wiring needs its own conversation

Some houses from a certain era used solid aluminum wire for regular branch circuits. The issue with the old solid stuff isn’t that aluminum isn’t a good electrical conductor. It’s what happens at the connections. Aluminum expands and contracts more than copper, it oxidizes, and connections can loosen or overheat if the devices and connectors weren’t made for it.

Using a high quality thermal camera in my inspections, I’m frequently able to see temperature differentials indicating that a circuit or breaker is running hotter than expected, and it’s always an indicator that a closer look is warranted.

Warm outlets or switches, flickering lights, discoloration, a burnt-insulation smell, or outlets that just quit working can be signs of issues with connections. If your house has aluminum wiring, I’m going to recommend an electrician who actually knows aluminum branch wiring and the accepted repair methods. This is not a YouTube-tutorial project. And that recommendation goes in the report whether or not I found an active problem on inspection day — the connections at risk are hidden inside walls and boxes, which means “looks fine right now” and “is fine” are not the same finding.

Splices are where the generations meet

Old houses collect wiring the way a garage collects tools — a little from every era, connected together at some point by somebody. Knob-and-tube spliced into cloth-covered cable, cloth-covered spliced into modern Romex, copper joined to aluminum, new circuits stretched off old ones. None of that is automatically a problem. Plenty of splices are done right.

A splice done right lives inside an approved box, uses a real connector, has a cover on it, and stays accessible so someone can actually inspect or fix it later. A splice done wrong is two wires twisted together and left dangling between joists, or a junction box buried behind drywall where nobody will ever see it again until something goes wrong. Hiding a connection doesn’t make it safer — it just makes sure nobody notices when it isn’t.

In older houses, it’s usually the additions and renovations — not the original construction — that tell you the most about what you’re actually dealing with. A carefully kept old system can be in better shape than a newer one that’s been “improved” five times by five different people with five different levels of skill.

DIY work leaves a signature

Not all homeowner electrical work is bad, and not all licensed work is good — but bad DIY work tends to have a recognizable style: boxes with no covers, cables shoved into boxes with no clamp, extension cords doing the work of real wiring, white wires used as hot wires with no marking, receptacles just hanging by their own conductors, and enough electrical tape to suggest it’s holding the house up structurally.

Finding one weird thing doesn’t mean the whole system is a disaster. A pattern of them does. If the person who did the work I can see clearly didn’t know what they were doing, I have to assume they made connections I can’t see too — and that’s usually when I recommend a broader look by an electrician, not just a patch on the one thing that’s visible.

Renovations, in general, are often harder on old wiring than age alone. An untouched hundred-year-old house has a wiring system that at least makes internal sense for its era. A heavily renovated one can have five different systems stitched together with no plan at all — new appliances hung off ancient circuits, a finished basement hiding improvised wiring in the ceiling, a shiny new panel wired up to circuits nobody touched.

The bottom line

Old houses aren’t defective for being old. Plenty of what’s in the walls is doing exactly what it was built to do. Some of it needs correcting. Some of it was installed by a thrifty homeowner named Earl over a long weekend in 1978 and should be treated accordingly.

My job isn’t to punish a house for missing standards that didn’t exist when it was built. It’s to figure out what’s actually there today — is it damaged, overloaded, badly modified, obsolete, or just quietly misleading you into thinking it’s fine. A new panel doesn’t prove new wiring. A three-prong outlet doesn’t prove a ground. Lights turning on don’t prove any of it is safe.

Electricity is remarkably willing to keep working inside a bad installation right up until it isn’t. That’s why we look.

But finding out that something old hasn’t failed yet is not the same as clearing it. When what’s actually there is knob-and-tube, ungrounded circuits, old aluminum branch wiring, or anything else that predates modern code by half a century, my recommendation is the same regardless of how well it’s currently behaving: upgrade it. The gap between what these systems were built to handle and what a modern electrical code requires isn’t small, and closing that gap is worth doing on its own merits — not just when something’s actively wrong.

— Austin Reida, Owner of Resonant Homes LLC | NH/VT Licensed Home Inspector | Home Builder


If you’re looking at an older home and want to know more about the electrical system, that’s exactly the kind of thing I dig into on every inspection. Schedule an inspection, learn more about our inspections, or reach out with questions first. No pressure, just information.

Call or text: (802) 289-0025
Email: connect@resonanthomesnh.com

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *